unternehmensnachfolge-anwalt.at
Mag. Bernhard Brandauer, Rechtsanwalt
How clear roles, credible communication and workable agreements can retain key employees throughout a family-business transition.
Key employees often determine whether family succession works in daily operations. They know customers, plant, pricing, people and informal processes not recorded in manuals. Their own risk rises during transition: two generations issue instructions, future roles remain open and rumours replace reliable information. Retention therefore starts with credible leadership and communication, not a bonus.
The first legal question is whether there is a transfer of business. Existing employment relationships then generally move to the new owner under section 3 AVRAG. Key people do not need to sign entirely new contracts merely to remain employed. Additional duties, retention bonuses, new reporting lines or ownership participation require clear separate arrangements. Existing rights and new incentives should not be folded into an opaque package.
The topic page on transfer of business and succession explains the framework. This guide focuses on people with critical knowledge or relationships: identifying dependencies, timing communication, making credible commitments and transferring knowledge so that neither the founder nor one employee remains irreplaceable.
The check sorts knowledge dependency, role uncertainty and contractual incentives. The result can be sent to the firm with your staffing structure.
Already know you want to get in touch? Go straight to the enquiry form.
Create a knowledge matrix for customers, systems, pricing, deadlines, suppliers and incidents. Assign a second person, location and practical test to each field. Compensate additional handover work transparently.
The transferor and successor first agree function, manager, decision authority and development. They then hold a joint meeting. Commitments are recorded in a short role sheet and not undermined by later individual instructions.
Describe duties, people and budget authority, representation, targets, pay and start. Review whether a power of attorney or procuration is needed. A vague expectation to absorb more work during transition is not a career path.
Set the retention period, operational milestone, due date, partial payment and consequences of different exit reasons. Avoid making every payment depend solely on unrestricted employer discretion. A bonus supplements a clear role rather than replacing it.
Agree stages, skills, decision space, feedback and target dates. State who decides progression. The path should not depend on the transferor deciding to let go at an unspecified point.
Discuss intended timing, future leadership, role, concerns, knowledge needs and development. Promise only matters that are corporately, organisationally and financially approved. Record the outcome and next date.
Not every manager is a key employee and not every key employee has a prominent title. The question is what happens after an unexpected absence. Do quotations stop, are plant settings unknown, does a customer relationship break or can only one person reconcile payroll? The analysis follows processes rather than hierarchy.
A dependency matrix reviews knowledge, relationships, authority, system access and deputy cover. For each field it asks how long the operation remains effective without the person and how quickly knowledge can be replaced. A high score does not automatically mean a bonus. It first reveals where documentation, second ownership and a handover plan are missing.
The exercise should not become a secret list of supposedly disloyal employees. Its purpose is resilience. Key people benefit from reliable holiday cover, accessible leadership and a sustainable workload. Results belong in the succession plan, not as a label in a personnel file.
Where a transfer of business occurs, section 3(1) AVRAG generally transfers existing employment relationships to the new owner. Existing function, pay, leave and other rights are not freely reset because a child assumes the business. Section 4 AVRAG provides additional protection for collective agreement terms in accordance with that provision.
Without employee representation, section 3a AVRAG requires written advance information on timing, reason, legal, economic and social consequences and measures. Where there is a works council, ownership and organisational changes may engage section 109 ArbVG. Statutory information is not marketing. It must match the transfer agreement and measures actually approved.
New duties, pay, bonuses and authority are agreed separately. A key employee should not believe existing rights must be surrendered to secure a future in the operation. Equally, the employer need not accept every expectation. A transparent change proposal states reason, content, start and consideration. The article on the family transfer of business explains the underlying framework.
Information given too early without reliable answers creates anxiety. Information given too late signals distrust and lets rumours grow. The right point is reached when structure, likely timing, future leadership and material effects can be explained honestly. Every schedule need not be final, but the core message should not change weekly.
Key people are generally spoken to before wider communication where their contribution is material to the transition. Transferor and successor conduct the meeting together. They explain the purpose, intended role and next steps. Personal concerns are heard without making unreviewed promises. A short written summary follows.
The wider workforce receives one message and clear contacts. Individual financial terms remain confidential, while a new function is communicated where it affects collaboration. Conflicting statements by the generations must stop. The staged approach in trial management can also structure visible responsibility for senior employees.
A retention bonus can fit a clear period or milestone, such as completing knowledge transfer, stabilising after completion or training a deputy. The agreement should state when entitlement arises and how different termination reasons are treated. A broad repayment of every earned amount is more likely to create dispute than loyalty.
A binding development path often has greater effect. A division head receives people and budget authority, a technical expert builds a second line, or a customer lead systematically introduces the successor. Duties, competence, pay and timing belong together. Additional burden without decision authority is not development.
Equity participation is the most far-reaching option. It changes voting, information, distribution and exit. It should not be promised quickly out of fear of resignation. Virtual or performance participation can offer economic alignment but still requires clear drafting. The family should first decide whether a permanent co-shareholder is genuinely intended.
Knowledge transfer is not achieved by a shared folder alone. Critical tasks are observed, performed together and finally completed by the deputy under real conditions. The key employee confirms not only documentation but whether another person can handle a customer case, plant outage or month-end close.
Customer and supplier relationships need joint meetings. The transferor introduces the successor, the key employee explains continuity and future responsibility is made clear. Contacts should not have to report to three people. Systems use named accounts, roles, approvals and emergency access rather than shared passwords.
The knowledge matrix records field, owner, deputy, location, transfer step and test date. It is updated monthly. The succession risk check helps place people dependencies alongside contracts and financing.
Before the meeting, review the employment contract, amendments, role description, authorities, targets, outstanding time and leave, and existing bonus rules. Add the organisation chart before and after transition, reporting lines and knowledge matrix. This avoids new promises conflicting with existing arrangements.
The meeting follows a clear sequence: significance of the person, confirmed succession position, future role, requested handover contribution, employee expectations and possible agreement. Open points receive an owner and date. Pay or equity is not improvised under pressure at the table.
Legal review also benefits from the transfer draft, employee overview, collective agreement and milestones. The first succession meeting checklist structures the wider position. The goal is a retention strategy that remains fair and explainable without forcing identical solutions on different roles.
No. Section 3 AVRAG generally provides for existing employment relationships to transfer. New duties, bonuses and authority may need additional agreements but must be separated from statutory continuity.
When structure, likely timing, future leadership and material effects can be explained reliably. Works council involvement and statutory information without employee representation also need to be observed.
No. It fits a defined period or milestone. If role, leadership and development remain unclear, money often retains only briefly. Conditions, due date and exit cases should be understandable.
Use a knowledge matrix, named deputy, documented process and practical tests. The second person should actually perform critical tasks. File storage without tested cover is insufficient.
Book an initial consultation. We clarify the legal framework, critical documents and next steps. Callback within one working day.
Contact us